Reasons to file a patent in South Africa when considering the African continent

06 Nov 2018

South Africa (SA) is widely recognised as the gateway to the rest of Africa, a continent which contains 30% of the world’s mineral reserves, and 1 billion people. It is therefore an attractive launch pad for many international companies when it comes to the protection and enforcement of intellectual property of services or products owned by them that they wish to share with Africa. Even more attractive is SA’s patent system which is simple, quick and affordable.

When it comes to patents, the Companies and Intellectual Property Commission (CIPC) is custodian of all applications that are filed in SA. SA’s highly cost-effective depository patent process makes it one of the cheapest in the world, somewhat 20 to 30 times cheaper than other patent regimes.

In addition, SA does not have a substantive patent examination system and CIPC does not investigate the novel or inventive merit of patent applications. Instead, CIPC assesses the formal requirements in order to ensure that all documentation filed is correct. The nature of this formal examination patent process means that the responsibility for ensuring that patent applications filed in South Africa are valid reside with the applicant.

Annual renewal fees in SA are very low, especially when compared to those payable in foreign jurisdictions, and the depository patent system is considered one of the cheapest in the world, in fact, it is known to be 20 to 30 times cheaper when compared to other patent regimes.

Obtaining a granted SA patent is very quick and straightforward with acceptance of a SA patent application generally taking place 12 months from the filing of a SA national phase application or 18 months from filing a SA complete application.

There is no patent opposition in SA, and the patentability of a patent can only be challenged post-grant by way of SA’s court system. The requirements for post-grant amendments, however, are more stringent than those requirements for pre-grant amendments.

It is common practice for an applicant to request that acceptance be delayed until a corresponding foreign patent, which has undergone substantive examination, has been granted and to amend the claims of the SA patent application by way of a pre-grant amendment to conform to those granted in respect of the corresponding foreign patent.

By delaying acceptance and amending the patent claims to conform to corresponding granted claims, an applicant can ensure that their SA patent is granted with a valid set of patent claims in a cost effective and simple manner.

SA has a credible court system and specialized Patent Court. The court of first instance in patent litigation matters is the Court of the Commissioner of Patents, a specialist court that has the same authority as a single judge of the High Court. An appeal against a decision of the Court of the Commissioner of Patents or the High Court, can be made to the full bench of the High Court (a panel of three judges instead of one), or to the Supreme Court of Appeal, the highest court of appeal in all matters except constitutional matters.

It is clear that the simplicity and affordability of obtaining enforceable patents, whether to operate in SA or as a gateway to the rest of the African continent, is a highly attractive option for foreign companies. And, having the right intellectual property experts on the ground with extensive African experience is the final step to ensuring potential success.

See also:

(This article is provided for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. For more information on the topic, please contact the author/s or the relevant provider.)
Ursula Baravalle

Ursula is a Director and Patent Attorney at KISCH IP. She has experience in: Drafting local and foreign chemical, petrochemical, biochemical, microbiological and pharmaceutical-related patent specifications; Prosecuting international patent applications... Read more about Ursula Baravalle


Intellectual Property Law articles by

Intellectual Property Law articles on GoLegal